I’m voting with my wallet and giving Pandora $36

Last week I quit being a user of Pandora, and they couldn’t have been happier. Why? Because I became a customer, paying $36/yr for their new Pandora One (P1) service. Is P1 such an awesome improvement over their free service that i felt compelled to upgrade? Actually no, while the P1 bells and whistles are nice, it’s not that much different than vanilla Pandora (mostly because free Pandora is already damn good). Rather I whipped out my credit card and gave Tom my money because Pandora is a company that I want to support, one which treats their customers well, cares about their product and has to deal with very tough partners – the music labels.

This experience is why I strongly agree with MG’s TechCrunch article about freemium services. He writes “rather than launching a service with a freemium model, I think it’s important to gain a large and passionate user-base first.” Going forward, the products most successful in transforming users into customers are going to be those tied to companies which build relationships, not just feature sets. Why? Because i’m voting with my wallet when i decide to become a customer, and i want to vote for companies and people that I like. I need to self-identify with their values. Know that they value me as a customer and are willing to engage me. Pandora CTO Tom retweeted my note about subscribing to P1. Sure this was marketing for him and just a small ego boost for me, but it’s emblematic of the relationship i want to have as a customer of his company.
My sense is that we’re not only going to see this in “user pays company” but also an increase in direct “user pays user” w/in content sites. Not necessarily just in micropayments, although i’m very interested in Facebook’s virtual currency experiments. Rather i foresee models evolving which support a longer tail of ongoing content creation – is it crazy to think that i might pay $2/year to a Flickr photographer who produces a lovely “photo of the day?” Personally, i’m excited about transitioning more of my media budget from established channels (cable tv, magazine subscriptions, movie tickets) and giving it directly to the companies and creators I care about rather than those who just happen to have been gatekeepers.

2 thoughts on “I’m voting with my wallet and giving Pandora $36

  1. I wanted to sign up earlier for their previous subscription service ($36/year) but they made it impossible to find the sign-up page. Only after Pandora One came out did they put a subscription link on their home page, so I signed up.

  2. I totally agree with your idea about stretching the concept of 'user pays company' to 'user pays user'.
    However, I disagree that it may be time already to make the budget shift you are thinking about. 🙂

    Early in the years when internet was invented, companies wanted to charge customers for their email accounts. Guess what happened? Today, we are still using free email accounts and that tells you, something did not work here. Chances are high that that 'something' was that customers were not yet ready for 'that' transition yet. And I personally believe we may be a long way from there. Something basic needs to change for this transition to happen – improvements in the lifestyle and incomes of the people so that they have that money for such luxuries. I call it a luxury because users / customers still have good alternatives – phones, postal services and libraries.

    Btw, thanks for the blog, enjoyed reading it and made note of it on my blog too 🙂

    – chandni

Comments are closed.